🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration represents how minimally it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.